Size & fit evidence
See which sizing detail needs a closer look.
A size label needs a defined measurement, unit and source. Put the garment specification beside the sample before deciding what to verify.
Illustrative local measurement example. These authored values do not measure a shopper or recommend a size.
ZIP-01 / garment-r01
Start with a measurement you can name.
Illustrative local measurement example. These authored values do not measure a shopper or recommend a size.
Sample M
Selected for review
- Specification
- 54.0 cm
- Sample value
- 54.0 cm
- Difference
- 0.0 cm
Within the example rule
Sample L
- Specification
- 56.0 cm
- Sample value
- 54.5 cm
- Difference
- -1.5 cm
Verify physical sample
Illustrative tolerance: ±1.0 cm. Classification uses the unrounded values in cm. Display: one decimal in cm, two in inches, using exactly 1 inch = 2.54 cm.
A matching number is only one part of the review.
ZIP-01 / M / Chest width (flat)
Within the example rule
The known sample value is within the authored tolerance. A numerical match does not establish fit or production acceptance.
Measurement method not verified
This source gap stays open for every size and dimension, including a matching sample.
Open the sample evidence record
- Record
- ZIP-01 / M / chest / sample-01
- Garment version
- ZIP-01 / garment-r01
- Dimension definition
- Straight across the garment at the underarm line, laid flat. This is not body circumference.
- Source type
- Authored demonstration data · 3 October 2026
- Needed next
- A dated physical-sample measurement, the agreed method and the responsible reviewer.
Flat width and circumference answer different questions.
Neither describes a person's body or preferred ease. Doubling a flat width is not a verified body measurement or a size recommendation.
Keep the evidence with the size-guide draft.
- 01
Measurement evidence
Record the garment, variant, dimension, unit, method and date. Keep missing values visible.
- 02
Approved brand definitions
Confirm the definitions, tolerance and review owner against the brand's actual specification.
- 03
Reviewed size-guide draft
Review the wording and representation against that evidence before considering publication.
A shopper recommendation would also need appropriate shopper data, fit preference and a validated mapping. This example collects none.
A return reason starts a question.
Illustrative return report: “This felt too small.”
Request the relevant product, variant, guide and customer context. Could personal preference or another factor explain the report?
These are questions to investigate, not causes established by the report. No model, cart size or return decision changes here.
Inspection context
Inspection context, before a conclusion
A supplied observation is not a confirmed defect or a decision about the whole lot. Keep the source, sample and method together.
- Example ID
- EX-INSPECTION-CONTEXT-01
- Fictional example
- Yes
Every supplied value in this example is fictional. Unknown means the field was not supplied.
Separate the records
A booking describes a planned inspection. An observation records what was reported. A report and a corrective action are separate records; one does not prove the other exists.
A fictional sample note
Example only: sample EX-SAMPLE-01, front seam. Note EX-NOTE-01 reports an uneven stitch. The image is not supplied. This is a reported observation, not a finding verified by NOGL.
- Note ID
- EX-NOTE-01
- Note version
- 1
- Sample ID
- EX-SAMPLE-01
- Reported region
- Front seam
- Reported observation
- Uneven stitch
- Checklist named in the note
- EX-CHECK-v2
Keep version conflicts visible
The note names checklist EX-CHECK-v2; the supplied checklist is EX-CHECK-v3. Their applicability has not been reconciled. Do not silently replace either version.
- Supplied checklist ID
- EX-CHECK-v3
- Checklist applicability
- Unknown
Show what is missing
Capture time, inspection method, sample selection, lot size and acceptance criteria are unknown in this example. A missing image is not a clean image; one sample does not establish a lot result.
- Capture time
- Unknown
- Original image
- Unknown
- Inspection method
- Unknown
- Sample selection
- Unknown
- Lot ID
- Unknown
- Lot size
- Unknown
- Acceptance criteria
- Unknown
- Inspection report ID
- Unknown
- Corrective action ID
- Unknown
Prepare a human review
Ask the responsible reviewer for the original image, applicable checklist and sampling context. Record the unresolved question before any separate acceptance decision. Nothing is sent or approved here.
- Responsible reviewer
- Unknown
- Approval
- Unknown
Return to the product evidence
Compare the supplied measurement method and specification context. This guide does not detect defects, certify compliance, accept a lot or connect to an inspection system.
What this review can tell you.
Is this virtual try-on?
No. An appearance preview explores how a garment is represented. This example compares authored garment measurements. Neither establishes physical fit.
Where do these numbers come from?
They are fixed demonstration data for ZIP-01. No measurement engine, image analysis or live product feed produced them.
Why verify the method when the values match?
A matching number can still use the wrong definition, sample or method. Those sources need review before accepting the record.
What would an authorized pilot require?
An agreed garment set, approved specifications and tolerances, recorded physical samples, an accountable product owner and a bounded review process.